<rss version="2.0">

<channel>

<title>OurAirports: Comments on airports in Washington, United States</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/countries/US/WA'/comments.html</link>
<description>Comments left by OurAirports members who have visited airports in Washington, United States.</description>

<item>
<title>[US-KVUO] "Pearson" by Todtc</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2415</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:16:10 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2415</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;An airport with a neat museum and a lot of history. Visited here for the West Coast Cherokee Pilot&#039;s Assoc. Fly-In. Great location, just review the chart carefully and be prepared to follow Portland&#039;s instructions, especially if not granted access to Class C airspace.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[WA58] "re: FAA duplicate" by ptomblin</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2273</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:26:39 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2273</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;But the two records also list different owners.  I suppose the only way this is going to be settled is for somebody to phone both owners.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[WA58] "re: FAA duplicate" by david</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2272</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:21:27 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2272</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that&#039;s why the FAA hasn&#039;t spotted the duplication.  From the sat view, it&#039;s clear that they&#039;re the same airport, with the runway described differently -- there&#039;s not room for a second strip on the same island.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[WA58] "re: FAA duplicate" by ptomblin</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2270</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:15:58 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2270</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and the two records have different runways, one is 16/34 1500x75 and the other is &quot;NW/SE&quot; 1500x100.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[WA58] "re: FAA duplicate" by ptomblin</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2269</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:13:22 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2269</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly enough, they aren&#039;t *exactly* duplicates, at least not after I&#039;ve done processing them into my navaid.com database.  The latitude, longitudes and elevations are slightly different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have WA58 is 48.6525, -122.584166667, elev 5 and WA93 is 48.652606388889, -122.57461722, elev 8.  I think that makes them 1.8nm apart according to &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://williams.best.vwh.net/gccalc.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://williams.best.vwh.net/gccalc.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[WA58] "FAA duplicate" by david</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2268</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:17:05 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=2268</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The FAA has a duplicate entry in their database, listing this airport as both WA58 and WA93.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[US-59S] "Closed in 2006" by david</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=1114</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:00:37 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=1114</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From 1964 until it closed in 2006, this airport was home to the Northwest Antique Airplane Club and the annual Evergreen fly-in.  It was sold in 2006, but as of early 2008, had not yet been redeveloped.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>[US-3B8] "had an aeronca ch7ac here" by Anonymous Flier</title>
<link>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=780</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:56:33 -0400</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.ourairports.com/comments.html?comment=780</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;it has not changed since 1976 stilla charming but short field&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
  
</rss>